Sunday, February 24, 2013

Hume!: The Presumption of Naturalism and the Probability of Miracles: A Reply to Keith Parsons | W.K.Clifford Speaks

Hume!: The Presumption of Naturalism and the Probability of Miracles: A Reply to Keith Parsons | W.K.Clifford Speaks

1 comment:

  1. Instead of his inanities, that author should give evidence for any miracles, as sophistry cannot instantiate any.
    I ask has he found any miracles that such as James Randi would find credible by conducting tests to overcome fraud and other natural matters? Why does he assume that anyone else should believe in them when he gives no evidence, just rhetoric?

    Have you found any evidence for any miracles?

    ReplyDelete